This Article
matyas_Blog_Featured_image
Logo_TLMUX_BolgFeatured
matyas_Blog_Featured_image
TheRegister_vignette
Patiner_vignette
Hackathon1_featured
Damien_Blog_featured
tv_pf
tlmUX_1

First day at the Google Analytics Authorized Consultants yearly summit was entirely dedicated to Website Optimizer.  Now just to get this out of the way, yes there is lots of information and presentations on new features and case studies.  Unfortunately, I cannot share all of it with you because of an NDA.

I can tell you this, however: the recurring theme is not on how easy it is to use Website Optimizer or even Website Optimizer best practices or guidelines. It is really more about the reality our clients experience when putting in place landing page optimization tests. Two main things came out: the difficulty of establishing an internal process (initial reticence from parties ranging from marketers to IT departments) and the lack of budget.

These two elements seem to be the most recurrent, which is rather unfortunate because putting landing page optimization tests in place should not prove to be that complicated (agreed that there may always be an exceptional technical challenge). What surprised me the most was that even today’s most popular case study – the Obama Presidential Campaign – ran into the same challenges, yet the outcome is clearly impressive

We were fortunate enough to have Dan Siroker, former Director of Analytics for Obama’s New Media team during the presidential campaign, walk us through his reality over the two years he spent working for that team.  It is really amazing to see the results he managed to achieve and the level of customization of the content provided to users that landed on Obama’s website.  The attention to detail of the dedicated analytics team helped the Obama team raise 656 million dollars out of which 500 million dollars came from the website alone.  As you can imagine, Dan’s team was small and did not have much of a budget to work with but they managed to start small and gain credibility through small and quick breakthroughs until more resources were allocated to allow them to do even more.

Starting small enabled Obama’s New Media team to develop a landing page optimization culture that eventually led to some very impressive content customization.  Basically, it let the New Media team start segmenting and targeting each user for two purposes: 1) to keep raising money for the campaign at first  2) to press the user to vote (e.g. by giving voting locations).  The message was personalized for each user based on different variables ranging from geo-location, call to action clicked by the user, etc.

As a website owner or marketing manager who understands the value of user segmentation and content customization, you most likely have very developed ideas on the messages you want to put forward. However, an important lesson learned today is: Keep it simple, start small.  You will get results and it will be easier to get other departments on board with you.

Follow me on twitter.com/Humberto2210 to stay updated on the GAAC Summit

I’m a business-oriented guy. I see returns in dollars. When I get final feedback from a client about a web site project I want to hear “It’s working.”

In the development of a web site, participative democracy is not just something to consider – it’s a key factor for success. In my experience, more input is better and input can come from multiple sources. While marketing and technical staff provide valuable information, the gemstones are often uncovered after talking to non-marketing stakeholders.

There are no bad ideas

Ignoring ideas from different departments and expertise’s can be fatal to a site’s ultimate success.  All shareholders have frustrations, fears and ideas to offer.

As a proven methodology at w.illi.am, participatory democracy proves itself time and time again. We were recently consulting France Telecom on a web site revamp, and it was through a candid conversation with a call center employee that we learned the help desk used “scenarios” to reply to technical questions from clients.

Something we never considered in initial meetings, we integrated the scenarios in the technical support section of the web site. The bottom-line results were immediate, alleviating the load of help desk calls, and giving web-savvy clients the option to help themselves. Had we worked in a web strategy “bubble” we never would have put the scenarios online.

Why involve multiple stakeholders?

  • It allows the web site strategy team to collect a lot of data and opinions, gaining insight on the true workings of a company, and the industry. Just when you think you know exactly what is needed, new information adds depth to the shortcomings of a current site plan, helping everyone gain a deeper understanding of what the site can –and should– accomplish.
  • Giving everyone a voice means better buy-in on the final product. It allows people to voice their concerns and be part of the web revamp process, ensuring the site will be a company-wide communications channel and a tool for smoothing operational processes.

Three types of consultation:

Meetings

Meetings involving multiple stakeholders are a good starting point for a global idea of what is needed. Key people at an initial meeting would be:

  • Marketing staff
  • Product Managers
  • Someone from each division (verticals ie B2B, B2C, etc.)
  • HR people (if needed)
  • Customer care managers

Face-to-face

The next line of consultations should be face-to-face interviews with internal users and stakeholders. Sometimes, in a large meeting, people are afraid to say things or –conversely- are “louder” than others lobbying for their department. One-on-one face time helps put things in perspective and offers a safe way to express ideas.

Focus Groups

Focused meetings with the customer care center or with specific departments or verticals helps define the scope of what is needed, what directions the company is moving in, and where the web site needs to evolve.

Some people may think too many cooks spoil the broth – but we’ve learned otherwise. We’ve revamped web sites for AT&T, Astral, Cogeco, Cyberpresse, Workopolis, Duproprio.com and thousands of others. By digging deeper to find information about the company as a whole, we are able to propose web solutions that are in line with business objectives, users’ expectations and a company’s reality.

Participatory democracy is part of a proven methodology in our consultation process – and our clients are telling us our process gets results. They’re telling us “It’s working.”

Ask web developers what they hate most about web technologies, chances are they will say javascript, and for some parts, they are right to do so. But to understand why Javascript is so much hated we need to go back in time. In the early years of Netscape, in 1995.

In the nineties, Netscape was flourishing with between 50% and 80% of the browsers’ market and was in a intense combat with Internet Explorer. A guy at Netscape, named Brendan Eich, was given a difficult task of creating a language to make Netscape interacting more dynamically with websites. And of course they wanted this language the day before they asked it . In the time Brendan had, he did the most he could, and created a versatile language that even script kids could pick up, Javascript, he also created the DOM (Document Object Model) on top of Javascript. Now the difference between Javascript and the DOM is simple. Javascript is the basic language you use to make sentence. But the DOM is what is understanding this sentence and makes it interact with the document the way you asked it.

Microsoft was not going to let that happen

Microsoft was certainly not going to let Netscape have « Javascript » and not them, they decided to reverse engineer and implement it in Internet Explorer. Now problems began. They, very unfortunately, did not do a very good job at this implementation. Which means that for doing one simple operation on Netscape and Internet explorer, you had to code 2 implementation for both of them, because the DOM was not understanding the same sentence for both. In fact javascript, the programming language is mostly fine, the biggest problem is the DOM API, some words means nothing to IE and some other means nothing to Firefox. This is what drives web developers crazy. You have to write code specifically to some browsers because they do not follow standards, you have no choice, Internet Explorer represent 67% of your user base, you have to do an implementation for them.

javascript

You need to understand that this happened in 1995. The web did not had the same needs than today. Now web applications are vastly more complex. Some people had to step up and create cross browser API’s to deal with the DOM, and they did. Which means now you write one line, and some API dispatch the good implementation to each browser. This has make the life of web developers much easier.

There is currently 3 major « all round » Javascript libraries, jQuery, Mootools and Prototype

At w.illi.am, we decided to use the jQuery framework, which is now endorsed by a lot of major players, like Microsoft. Not only this is the most use Javascript framework in the world, this is the one we found the most powerful. Writing Javascript with jQuery enabled us to create more powerful web site than ever before and this tool is one of many that make us confident that we are ready for the future of the web.

Les médias sociaux et le web 2.0 bousculent les pratiques d’affaires et de gestion des petites comme des grandes entreprises, influençant ainsi significativement des activités telles le recrutement, les relations avec les investisseurs, les relations publiques voire l’image de marque. Voici l’Entreprise 2.0.

C’est Obama ou Kennedy qui disait : Ne vous demandez pas ce que l’état peut faire pour vous mais bien ce que vous pouvez faire pour l’état. ? Ce sont des paroles célèbres de JFK bien Barack Obamasur, mais je vous parie que si vous le demandiez à 50 personnes âgées entre 20 et 35 ans ils vous répondraient sans hésiter en très forte proportion: Obama voyons! Pourquoi? Simplement parce que son rayonnement obnubile la sphère sociale à un point tel qu’il jette ombrage à la plupart des autres politiciens fussent-ils du présent ou du passé. Mon propos n’est pourtant pas politique, mais lorsqu’Obiwan Obama a décidé de privilégier les médias sociaux pour annoncer la nomination de Joe Biden au titre de vice-président, il a apposé le sceau royal sur le média des médias. Le 15 janvier 2009 quand la catastrophe évitée de l’avion de l’US Airways amerrit sur la rivière Hudson a été retransmise mondialement par le réseau Twitter avant tout autre média, le journalisme de reportage a pris le sentier du mercenariat.

Alors dans cette perspective historique je suis tenté de virer de bord la fameuse parole de Kennedy et de poser la question suivante; Décideurs, ne vous demandez pas ce que le web 2.0 pout faire pour vous mais bien ce que vous pouvez faire pour le web 2.0. En d’autres mots, les entreprises qui demeurent dans une position attentiste ou qui a tout le moins ne sont pas partie prenante d’une stratégie d’intégration du web 2.0 dans leur pratiques d’affaires risquent de regarder la parade plutôt que d’en faire partie.

Ah je sais, plusieurs me diront : Arrête donc de brandir des épouvantailles! Wouais, on me disait cela il y a 15 ans pour le média écrit …aujourd’hui c’est tellement évident que toutes les activités du monde social et économique sont infiltrées, et que coule dans leurs veines le web 2.0. Pas besoin d’être devin, Kennedy ou Obama pour l’affirmer!

Et oui, déjà un an!

Il y a éxactement un an, le nouveau né du Web montréalais faisait déjà parler de lui par la mise en ligne du site de Rockdetente.

Si tout le monde se demandait si w.illi.am/ se prononçait William ou Will I Am, une chose est certaine, le petit nouveau se faisait scruter. Après une année de dur labeur, mais surtout de conseil, création, réalisation, … d’intelligence Web, l’équipe d’experts de w.illi.am/ était fière de célébrer son premier anniversaire jeudi le 1 octobre 2009.

C’est donc en compagnie de ses clients, partenaires, fournisseurs et des médias de l’industrie que la firme de conseil et développement Web s’est montrée sous toutes ses coûtures en inaugurant par la même occasion ses nouveaux bureaux  situés au centre-ville de Montréal, au coeur du Quartier des Spéctacles.

Voici les photos du cocktail: